Mercedes SLK World banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
DAS/STAR Premium Member 2005 SLK 55 AMG
Joined
·
4,024 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Smart car software tinkering legal - US ruling - BBC News

Smart car software tinkering legal - US ruling

Security researchers have been given the green light to hunt for flaws in car software by US authorities.
A ruling will allow users and expert analysts to carry out repairs. But changes such as extracting and selling code would still breach copyright.
Vehicle manufacturers opposed the move, saying repair garages could fix any issues.
The ruling follows claims the right to modify software could have prevented the Volkswagen emissions scandal.
The Library of Congress, which oversees the US Copyright Office, agreed with fair use advocates who argued that vehicle owners are entitled to modify their cars, which often involves altering software, Reuters reported.


'Protection'

Manufacturers, including General Motors (GM) and Deere, spoke out in opposition. A GM representative referred to a statement from an industry group that said the new rules would weaken safety innovation.
"Sensitive vehicle data could be easily manipulated, altered, or distributed - undetected - if these changes are implemented," the statement said.
Deere spokesman Ken Golden said the company stands by its earlier opposition. But he added that some systems that transmit data from the vehicle to Deere could still be protected by copyright.
Security researchers also pushed for copyright liability protection because computer programs are "pervasive" in modern machines and devices, including vehicles, home appliances and medical devices.
"We are pleased that analysts will now be able to examine the software in the cars we drive without facing legal threats from car manufacturers," said Kit Walsh, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which advocated for the rule changes.
Serious reservations

In the wake of the Volkswagen emissions deceit, the EFF said car manufacturers' software should not be protected from independent scrutiny.
"When you entrust your health, safety, or privacy to a device, the law shouldn't punish you for trying to understand how that device works and whether it is trustworthy," Walsh blogged. The new rules must be renewed in three years, he said.
Some US government agencies expressed serious reservations about the new rules, and the Environmental Protection Agency flatly opposed them.
"EPA explained that vehicle modifications are often performed to increase engine power or boost fuel economy, but that these modifications increase vehicle emissions and thus violate the Clean Air Act," the Library of Congress said in its final rule.
However, the new rules do not allow vehicle owners to break any other laws, the Library said, and will not take effect for a year so the EPA and other agencies have time to prepare.
 

·
Super Moderator UK SLK 55 AMG 2007
Joined
·
27,299 Posts
As long as alterations do not compromise safety I don't see why not?


The problems arise if court action is enacted.
Review any topic and you find that not all experts will agree (ditto judges) and the outcome can be a lottery.
Unless you can be certain of the full background of any expert, the value of their analysis can be questioned.


Read all the stories on how some get tickets overturned. Others, with similar and even identical events do not.


Jeff would get bored silly if they ruled that an owner could not modify a car in any way.


We have individual personalities. That diversity is why not everyone has discovered the joys of SLKs.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top