Mercedes SLK World banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
533 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I know we've discussed the Audi before and I know there have been complaints about interior quality from owners who then moved to an SLK but the reason i'm posting this is just out of a topic of interest.

250kW screwed out of 2.5litre's with some turbo help.

(I realise this is another topic entirely) I know many people are going this way but i'm still firm behind the big 8's and I know the world isn't going this way but if it isn't why are BMW and Audi and even MB still releasing "new" cars with big 8's with turbo's and twin turbos. 65 range, X6M/X5M, RS6 etc... :p Still a fan of the big v8's and 8 cylinders though.

 

·
Premium Member 2006 SLK55 AMG
Joined
·
3,053 Posts
all the 65s are v12s, not v8.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
720 Posts
I'm not too fond of the looks of this one, but the numbers look striking on paper. This car should leave all of its direct competitors in the dust while maintaining decent fuel economy. Kudos, Audi!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,134 Posts
All joking aside, I actually quite like the Audi TT, especially the recent version. I much prefer the syling of the SLK, which is one of the reasons we chose to buy one.

I've driven a TTs with the DSG gearbox a few times and it's a very entertaining package. Besides the rag-top, not much to dislike really. I also got to sit in an R8 the other day. Didn't get to drive it, but lovely car. Bargain price in the UK too..

Nah, hats-off to Audi...
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top