EU Expected to Rule That Starbucks, Fiat Benefited from Illegal Tax Deals Next Week - Mercedes Benz SLK Forum
Off Topic Anything but SLK talk. Please Note that religious and political discussions are not allowed....

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 Old 10-15-2015
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phoenix
Vehicle: 1999 slk 230
Other Toys: 1966 Mercedes Heckflosse
Posts: 14,574
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 530 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,120
Thanked 1,420 Times in 958 Posts
Garage
(Thread Starter)
EU Expected to Rule That Starbucks, Fiat Benefited from Illegal Tax Deals Next Week

Does that make you a Partner of Crime if you order a low fat Latte and zip away in your Fiat in morning Rush Hour?



By TOM FAIRLESS
Updated Oct. 15, 2015 7:26 a.m. ET
3 COMMENTS
BRUSSELS—The European Union is expected to rule as soon as next Wednesday that Starbucks Corp. and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles have benefited from illegal tax deals in Europe, wrapping up the first two of four high-profile tax investigations that were launched by the bloc last year.

The move, on the heels of a decision by the EU’s top court to strike down a trans-Atlantic data pact, is likely to heighten the uncertainty for U.S. multinationals operating in Europe.

After more than a year of investigation, the EU’s antitrust authority has decided that tax deals granted to Starbucks in the Netherlands and Fiat in Luxembourg violated EU law, which prohibits governments from supporting some companies and not others, people familiar with the matter said.

The antitrust regulators are now seeking feedback from other departments within the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, the people said. The commission is expected to announce its decision on Oct. 21 following a meeting of the EU’s top officials, the people said.

The EU could demand that Starbucks and Fiat pay back taxes that it deems should have been paid in the past, though it isn’t yet clear whether regulators will do so. If so, the demands could be substantial, EU officials have said.

Fiat and the commission declined to comment.

A spokesman for Starbucks said the company is cooperating with EU regulators. He said the company complies “with all relevant rules, laws and OECD guidelines” and pays a global effective tax rate of around 33%.

The EU’s decisions can be appealed at the bloc’s highest courts in Luxembourg by any interested party, including the companies, their competitors or EU governments, a process that often lasts for years. The investigations are technically directed at the governments involved, which might be asked to recoup any unpaid taxes, but won’t face punitive measures from Brussels.

It isn’t yet clear when the EU will conclude two other investigations involving Apple Inc.’s tax affairs in Ireland and Amazon.com Inc.’s in Luxembourg.

All of the companies have denied receiving special treatment, and the governments have denied giving it.

Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s antitrust chief, has postponed a trip to China this week to deal with “important matters requiring her presence and full attention in Brussels,” the commission said in an emailed statement on Thursday.

The four probes were announced last year amid a push by European governments to bolster national coffers that have been hit hard by the region’s financial crisis, and to assure citizens that the biggest corporations are paying their fair share of tax.

Since then, Ireland has done away with its so-called double-Irish tax scheme, while Luxembourg has changed the way it handles tax deals with multinationals.

Ms. Vestager welcomed those changes in an interview in February.

“I do not have an issue with specific countries or companies, what I’m interested in are schemes which allow for preferential treatment, for selectivity,” she told The Wall Street Journal.

The EU has made a priority of the probes, and Ms. Vestager had pledged to reach a decision on all four by June. That deadline was missed, however, and Ms. Vestager hasn’t given a new deadline.

The tax investigations are politically sensitive in Brussels because European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker was Luxembourg’s prime minister when the tax deals were in force.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-expec...eek-1444902968
Berliner Heckflosse is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK Forum > General Discussion about Mercedes Benz SLKs > Off Topic

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Upload your files to MEGAUPLOAD
Upload your images to ImageShack

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes Benz SLK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Is Ferrari Paying Fiat Chrysler Automobiles More Than 2 Billion Euros? Berliner Heckflosse Off Topic 0 11-17-2014 06:25 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Clubs, Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.