Would this be a Poser? - Mercedes Benz SLK Forum

Mercedes Benz Posers Photos of Posers trying to pass their Benz off as models that they are not to the uninformed with incorrect badges

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 Old 04-22-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 840
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 114 Times in 83 Posts
(Thread Starter)
Would this be a Poser?

Here is a question just for the fun of it. We know that the SLK 280 has a 3.L engine, with the same block as the C 300. Nobody has a clue where the "280" designation came from. So, here's the question.
Would it be a "Poser" if someone with an SLK 280 changed the badge to read SLK 300?
Dolebludger is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 04-22-2008
Founding Member #2

 
etyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Vehicle: 2008 SLK 55
Posts: 19,390
Country:
Chats: 11
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Thanks: 4,571
Thanked 3,141 Times in 2,269 Posts
Garage
I believe starting model year 2009, they're labeling it SLK 300 (instead 0f 280).

Eddy



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pewter(cubanitsilber metallic)/Beige, PIII package, Airscarf, Hands-Free Communication System, Lighting package; Designo Black Leather Cover on e-brake handle(Thank you Bill T), SmartTop v3.x, John's 3BFM, M113 AMG OEM air filters, Modified R170 ant., clear side-markers & front parking lamps w/error-free LEDs, chromed front & rear turn indicator lamps, steel mesh at battery bay cover & cabin air intake, sock-over-seatbelt buckles, belt-loop guide protectors, Lamin-X fog lamp protectors, bilateral rear fog lamps enabled, AMG crest on gear shift knob
etyu is offline  
#3 Old 04-22-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 350 Iridium Silver
Other Toys: 15 Audi S7, 16 MB GL 350, 2015 Porsche 911 GTS, Maxum SR 2200, Zone E Electric Car
Posts: 460
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Whats the benefit?....IMO, anyone who would know enough to know what the number meant would also know that it is incorrect....don't see the point.
nevets is offline  
 
#4 Old 04-22-2008
DansSlk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chats:
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I don't think that counts as poser so long as MB sell the SLK280 under the 300 name.

Would be a pain in the ass to remove the badge and align it again just to change 3 numbers tho.
#5 Old 04-22-2008
Registered Users
 
easty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Carolina
Vehicle: ///AMG 06
Other Toys: Ducati 1098, KTM 990 ADV
Posts: 2,205
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 46 Times in 28 Posts
What are you a fan of the SPARTA!!! I'd say do it if the new model will be like that and it may make it more modern for resale.. I'm wondering why i'm short or 245 spartan's to make a Persian empire cry..
easty is offline  
#6 Old 04-22-2008
-1-
Don - Founding Member #4
 
-1-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Vehicle: *2014 BMW i3*2012 Prius Plug-In*All Elect/Hybrid
Posts: 5,857
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,123
Thanked 743 Times in 587 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolebludger View Post
Here is a question just for the fun of it. We know that the SLK 280 has a 3.L engine, with the same block as the C 300. Nobody has a clue where the "280" designation came from. So, here's the question.
Would it be a "Poser" if someone with an SLK 280 changed the badge to read SLK 300?
With the new SLK 300 labeling for 2009, I wouldn't cry foul. It's normal to "round up". Personally, MB should have gone with the SLK 300 label from the beginning.
-1- is offline  
#7 Old 04-22-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 840
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 114 Times in 83 Posts
(Thread Starter)
Yes, -1-, that was my point that the 280 designation is and has always been incorrect, in light of Mercedes' traditional numbering system. 300 would have been correct. Indeed, I don't know where they came up with the "280" designation. Seems purely arbitrary.

I probably won't change the "280" badging on my car, just because it is too much trouble. But I still will consider it incorrect.
Dolebludger is offline  
#8 Old 04-23-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Exeter, UK
Vehicle: 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML320 CDI Sport - Fully Loaded!
Posts: 240
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I've never really got why Mercedes round up and down, for example 280 is a 3.0litre and the 200K is a 1.8litre!

Anyone care to explain Mercedes theory to me?
ryan.stephens is offline  
#9 Old 04-23-2008
Founding member #7
 
mtiede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Western New York
Vehicle: 2017 SLC 300R
Posts: 2,151
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Thanks: 265
Thanked 149 Times in 98 Posts
I'm guessing that they were concerned that someone wouldn't pay the price difference to go from the SLK300 to an SLK350. But if you are going from an SLK280 to an SLK350, there ought to be a big price difference, right?

So now that they souped up the 350 to give it some extra horses, they don't mind calling the 280 a 300 because the extra money for a 350 can be justified on the extra horses.

Just a guess.
mtiede is offline  
#10 Old 04-23-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennyslvania
Vehicle: 2006 Slk 350
Other Toys: Lots of ATV's
Posts: 1,596
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Baron7700
Quote:
Originally Posted by etyu View Post
I believe starting model year 2009, they're labeling it SLK 300 (instead 0f 280).


That is correct. Go for it.

280 has been around for awhile, so im sure the engine changed over time, but the name didnt. Glad they are dropping it.

But the new class being the the C300 makes it sound like a chrysler
Baron7700 is offline  
#11 Old 04-23-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 840
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 114 Times in 83 Posts
(Thread Starter)
Well, yes, many years ago there was a "Chrysler 300C" -- in the late 50's as I recall. Perhaps a little too close to "C 300" in the Mercedes C Class W 204. Strangely, the W 203 C Class for 2007 and a year or two before offered a "C 280" with the identical 3L engine as the '08 W 204 C 300. And now for '09, the SLK 280 (yep with the same 3L engine) is set to become the SLK 300 for '09.

Historically (and until lately) Mercedes' numeric designations were based on the number of liters the engine displaced X 100. For example, the early 50's 170 displaced 1.7L, the 300 SL gullwing displaced 3L, the '99 C 280 displaced 2.8L (not 3L). The examples could go on and on.

What I do not understand is why Mercedes recently abandoned this simple and logical naming system in some cases. There is nothing "280" about the SLK 280. 3L and not 2.8L. Does not have 280 hp. Does not have 280 lbs. ft. of torque. doesn't have 280 anything!
Dolebludger is offline  
#12 Old 04-23-2008
DansSlk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chats:
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Why do they do a lot of things?

Its just a German thing, BMW's naming setup is the same.

316 being a 1.8, 318 being a 2.0 and so on.
#13 Old 04-23-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta (Lawrenceville) GA
Vehicle: 2007 Mars Red/Black SLK55 AMG
Other Toys: 1968 Pontiac GTO, 2013 E63 AMG Wagon
Posts: 2,656
Country:
Chats: 120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,243
Thanked 513 Times in 331 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by -1- View Post
With the new SLK 300 labeling for 2009, I wouldn't cry foul. It's normal to "round up". Personally, MB should have gone with the SLK 300 label from the beginning.
In fact, MB rounds up all the time, SLK55 instead of SLK54, CLK63 instead of CLK62. What's a few tenths of a liter among friends.
dltslk is offline  
#14 Old 04-23-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nfld., Canada
Posts: 1,762
Country:
Chats: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 449
Thanked 342 Times in 150 Posts
Garage
Ford did the same thing with their (in)famous 5.0 - it was actually a 4.9L
FishtailnZ is offline  
#15 Old 04-24-2008
Premium Member

 
DesignoSLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Vehicle: 2000 Designo Copper SLK230 (x2)
Posts: 2,624
Country:
Chats: 2051
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 196 Times in 112 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan.stephens View Post
I've never really got why Mercedes round up and down, for example 280 is a 3.0litre and the 200K is a 1.8litre!

Anyone care to explain Mercedes theory to me?
I think you should rebadge "SLK180" just kidding.



I wouldn't rebadge to "SLK300" only because it wasn't offered for your model year. People who count would notice the infraction. IMHO

I'm going to add the AMG kit to my 170 only because it was an option for '00. Otherwise I wouldn't do it. I want to keep the car somewhat original. (Liberties taken on the term "somewhat" ).

Kevin ><>
'00 SLK230 Designo C_opper (2 of 26 - Yes, I have 2 of the 26...interesting story), '17 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport 2.0T Ultimate, Cessna 172/182 (pilot)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by DesignoSLK; 04-24-2008 at 05:44 AM. Reason: spelling...what else?
DesignoSLK is offline  
#16 Old 04-24-2008
Registered Users

 
alroumi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GMT+3
Vehicle: Kleemann K2
Posts: 10,721
Country:
Chats: 1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,030
Thanked 922 Times in 634 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesignoSLK View Post
I think you should rebadge "SLK180" just kidding.



I wouldn't rebadge to "SLK300" only because it wasn't offered for your model year. People who count would notice the infraction. IMHO

I'm going to add the AMG kit to my 170 only because it was an option for '00. Otherwise I wouldn't do it. I want to keep the car somewhat original. (Liberties taken on the term "somewhat" ).
You forgot the SLK55, its 5.4 so I have to have the last 5 removed for a 4.

06 SLK55 AMG (Kleemann K2)
alroumi is offline  
#17 Old 04-24-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Exeter, UK
Vehicle: 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML320 CDI Sport - Fully Loaded!
Posts: 240
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtiede View Post
I'm guessing that they were concerned that someone wouldn't pay the price difference to go from the SLK300 to an SLK350. But if you are going from an SLK280 to an SLK350, there ought to be a big price difference, right?
Yes I think you're right.

WhenI see the numbers 280 and 350 next to each other, it looks impressive , but when I see the numbers 300 and 350 next to each other, it doesn't have as much impact.

Whenever I see a 00 badging I always expect it to have a Kompressor badge somewhere i.e. 200 Kompressor, C160 Kompressor...
ryan.stephens is offline  
#18 Old 04-24-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 840
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 114 Times in 83 Posts
(Thread Starter)
mohammed and ryan.

I have decided to leave the car as it is. A change of badging wouldn't make the car run any better, now would it?
Dolebludger is offline  
#19 Old 04-24-2008
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Exeter, UK
Vehicle: 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML320 CDI Sport - Fully Loaded!
Posts: 240
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Very true!
ryan.stephens is offline  
#20 Old 07-01-2008
Registered Users

 
cyberdrakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SoCal, USA
Vehicle: SLK55 2006 widebody
Posts: 3,047
Country:
Chats: 7
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Thanks: 313
Thanked 328 Times in 237 Posts
Garage
Send a message via AIM to cyberdrakon Send a message via MSN to cyberdrakon
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallintoCouture View Post
It's like taking the numbers off completely...
I've taken all the numbers and badging off my SLK 55 AMG, as badging is really just a marketing thing and doesn't add to the overall look, only serves to clutter up the rear of the trunk.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RexAccelero.com Widebody SLK 55 AMG
THE ORIGINAL headlight housing blackout starter, Debadged, Kleyman CHMSL flasher, chromed signal bulbs,
roof module, larger AMG intake, H&R lowering springs, Custom X-pipe, 315/25/19" rear, 285/30/19" front, complete Carbon trim.
cyberdrakon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK Forum > General Discussion about Mercedes Benz SLKs > Mercedes Benz Posers

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Upload your files to MEGAUPLOAD
Upload your images to ImageShack

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes Benz SLK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not really a mercedes poser but wow... Eduardo Mercedes Benz Posers 14 06-25-2009 12:39 PM
Possible poser??? dltslk Mercedes Benz Posers 8 04-26-2008 05:25 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Clubs, Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.