2006 C280 "Quick" write up - Mercedes Benz SLK Forum

General Discussion Topics must pertain to all 3 generations of SLK - R170, R171 and R172

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 Old 03-22-2007
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennyslvania
Vehicle: 2006 Slk 350
Other Toys: Lots of ATV's
Posts: 1,596
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Baron7700
(Thread Starter)
2006 C280 "Quick" write up

Hey guys, as you know my car is in the shop right now, and as a loaner car, they gave me a 2006 C280 4 matic.

Its a nice car with the essential options, but nothing fancy (no comand, but sunroof heated seats. Dial A/c not digital, you know a loaner car.)

So i figured i would give you guys my 2 cents on the car.

First off, let me comment on how awesome our 7g auto is compared to the plain 5 speed. Since its a 4matic, the only transmission available is the 5spd. Its choppy. It seems to shift hard at times. In acceleration, the car doesnt use any of its torque. It just downshifts and revs, and usually when your not punching it, but leaving a light and pickin up small speed after first gear. But for everyday putzing around, it seems alright, although my hand is glued to the stick, making it shift my way. Other then that occasional problem of being stuck between gears (to often) its not all bad. Its amazing what those two extra gears can do to smoothen the ride.

the 3.0 liter 230 hp engine IS revy. it stays around 2500 to 3000 rpm for unless ur keeping speed under 50, or rolling. Any kind of acceleration puts u about or over 3k rpms. I know the SLK is a lot lighter, and hopefully my next problem isnt a problem with you guys. When pushing it, there is just nothing there it seems. I mean yes, for a 4 door, entry level it gets off the line alright. But doing 40 or 50 miles an hour, and hitting it hard to get to 70, the car seems flat. Hopefully its just the extra weight, AND the transmission being dull and just not using the engine. But hey, its not a sports car.

The ride is fantastic for it. Almost as smooth as the newer E class they gave me last time. But actually i preferred the C classes, light, but stable ride. While it had body roll, it really wasnt all that bad. And it could take some speedy turns. *Not like the slk tho, of course*. While the bumps in the road were barely felt, if at all, it was stiff enough to still feel the road, i feature i personally like, instead of floating on a magic carpet of the bigger smoother cars. U dont have any feel of the car that way in my opinion so it was a good mix.

I think the 4matic did play a good part in the cars handling. There are a few twists in turns on my highway that are practically 45 degrees to the left that i can take at about 65 70mph in the slk, but start to feel my rear come free a little. so i would never dare go past those speeds in the C class. BUT i did get up to about 60, and after coming over the fear of the body roll, the car was solid, with no sliding. This car being heavier, and with more weight shifting i thought i would of slid a little. *BTW I DID THIS WITH NO ONE AROUND, knowing the roads and limits of the car, do not try this at home etc etc etc etc would not recommend people be dumb like me*
Also on the way to my friends house, there is a road that is almost slalom like. And it was pretty glued to it. I put it up to the all time all wheel drive resisting huggin the road, even in areas where i would not tempt on the slk for whippin out the rear.

The 4Matic itself, being used for when you need it is cool! I dont know how many people have it here on there other MB's, but i think it works great. My driveway is about 1/5 mile long, and uphill. And its mostly plow, but still plenty enough to give me and my slk a run for its money everytime i go up it. It went up with no problem, even when i decided to punch it knowing i was on Ice. The ESP does go off when the all wheel drive was kickin in more, which i was a little surprised. Restricting the engine so much didnt seem quite like the answer. So i figured I would try it again with the esp, and realized, YES IT DOES restrict a lot. So i did what any other person bored with a 4matic and a bunch of ice and snow did. I went back down and turned the ESP off. When intentionally tryin to make it slip, i still couldnt, as the 4matic kept it solid, with minimal interference from the ESP that just doesnt go away in any MB. I had a smile on my face because getting up hasnt been as easy since I had my truck, which even with 4x4 still tended to slip.

The interior design of the car I thought was a little off though. The window lock, and window buttons are really low and forward. About halfway up my calf. Imagine if the window buttons where at the top of the bigger speaker on your slk door. Thats where they were. I thought it was quite a pain in the butt in case i wouldnt to open them. Also sitting in a comfortable position, there would be no way anyone over 5 feet tall could be comfortable in the back seat. I wold have to hug the sterring wheel, and the front passenger hug the dash. But it is a compact sedan, so its kind of expected. However, the trunk is HUGE, for the car, so was wondering why they wouldnt make the wheelbase a lil longer and set the seats about 3 to 6 inches back, and make the trunk a little smaller. or just set the seats a little higher and farther back to sit over the wheels. Thats just mho.

The exterior is a little blah, but has tremendous potential to make it look awesome. Unfortunately anyone interested buying one may be disappointed because of the awesome looks the new one will have. Unless you sign up for an elegance line.

My total opinion, For what the car is (a heavy 4 door compact, sport like sedan) its great. You can drive it year round with the 4matic. Handling is decent (doubt it had the sport suspension) and gas mileage is good. If you wanna push it, its more then ample. Its no sport car, but youll beat the pants off civics, up to acura's. Itll beat most 3 series, and some Acura's. A4's beware too, if you dont have the v6, your in trouble. Its a good car for what it is, a solid buy.

My last little bit of nit picking. I guess my third cent . If you have a SLK, and were looking for another benz to drive as a daily, or more practical. Go for a used E class. It makes sense that if you want room, get a back seat that is more usable and practical and a little smoother ride (you already have a harsh slk ride! ....comparitively). That is of course, if your finaces can do it, and you can find one. Either way the v6's in both models are powerful and efficent.

Well thats what I thought, comments?
Baron7700 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 03-22-2007
Founding Member

 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Vehicle: 06' MBZ SLK
Posts: 4,599
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Garage
Great review, pretty accurate with my assesstment as well. Thought it needed a little more power, felt kinda weak when you step on it, but I guess that's what the AMG model is for. Gear changes were slow, it's no sports car but great DD, quiet, and comfortable. The interior was a bit boring but it was a loaner and had minimum options.

997 TPC turbo C4S
981 Boxster S
06' SLK 350, Iridium/Ash all pkgs. 6-spd, 19" DCR. (Gone but not forgotten)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ynot is offline  
#3 Old 03-22-2007
Registered Users

 
alroumi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GMT+3
Vehicle: Kleemann K2
Posts: 10,721
Country:
Chats: 1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,030
Thanked 922 Times in 634 Posts
I was going to settle for a C55 then I changed my mind and settled for a SLK.

06 SLK55 AMG (Kleemann K2)
alroumi is offline  
 
#4 Old 03-23-2007
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennyslvania
Vehicle: 2006 Slk 350
Other Toys: Lots of ATV's
Posts: 1,596
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Baron7700
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alroumi View Post
I was going to settle for a C55 then I changed my mind and settled for a SLK.
"settled" for a 55AMG. DAMN!

I originally went into my dealership to get a C55, then saw the new SLK. Game over.

Unfortunatly, insurance prevented me from a 55, as it was just in my range, but way out if i wanted to drive with insurance.
Baron7700 is offline  
#5 Old 03-23-2007
Founding Member

 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Vehicle: 06' MBZ SLK
Posts: 4,599
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron7700 View Post
I originally went into my dealership to get a C55, then saw the new SLK. Game over.
I originally wanted a CLK500 cabriolet but my salesman said it didn't fit my style and asked me to wait for the new SLK. I wasn't too fond of the r170's style and handling coming from an e36 M3. What a great suggestion, I first saw it on mbworld.org then saw it in person. Took the 350 7G out for a spin and game over. Had to have it, my salesguy said manuals had to be ordered, took the opportunity to pick it up in Germany. I'm very glad I chose the SLK over the CLK. Now the CLK looks boring to me.

997 TPC turbo C4S
981 Boxster S
06' SLK 350, Iridium/Ash all pkgs. 6-spd, 19" DCR. (Gone but not forgotten)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ynot is offline  
#6 Old 03-24-2007
Registered Users

 
alroumi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GMT+3
Vehicle: Kleemann K2
Posts: 10,721
Country:
Chats: 1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,030
Thanked 922 Times in 634 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ynot View Post
I originally wanted a CLK500 cabriolet but my salesman said it didn't fit my style and asked me to wait for the new SLK. I wasn't too fond of the r170's style and handling coming from an e36 M3. What a great suggestion, I first saw it on mbworld.org then saw it in person. Took the 350 7G out for a spin and game over. Had to have it, my salesguy said manuals had to be ordered, took the opportunity to pick it up in Germany. I'm very glad I chose the SLK over the CLK. Now the CLK looks boring to me.
Great choice, The CLK is nice but not that sporty.

06 SLK55 AMG (Kleemann K2)
alroumi is offline  
#7 Old 03-24-2007
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,006
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yea, settled for a SLK55, man I saved 10 years to get a 99 230. Went without food, beer, chewing tobacco and wild women just to get a car. And you settled for top of the line SLK. Im hurt and jealous.
412driver is offline  
#8 Old 03-26-2007
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennyslvania
Vehicle: 2006 Slk 350
Other Toys: Lots of ATV's
Posts: 1,596
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Baron7700
(Thread Starter)
if im still fortunate enough to buy another Brand new benz, I want to get the EDP, what a cool experience it would be. Hopefully it will be some sort of sports car so i can really enjoy the autobahn! .

But hey, for the money that 280 was a great car, it felt a lil better in the C mode tho, as it kept the rpms down and the car in the power band.
Baron7700 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK Forum > General Discussion about Mercedes Benz SLKs > General Discussion

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Upload your files to MEGAUPLOAD
Upload your images to ImageShack

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes Benz SLK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes Turns AMG Into New Brand, Opening "Performance Centers" in US Tummy General Discussion 3 03-11-2008 11:45 AM
Pro/Con "Digital Automatic Climate Control" Worth it? webslinger General Discussion 45 03-10-2008 11:01 PM
Baby Monster "SLK55" meets the Baby Aston "AMV8" alroumi Off Topic 9 09-26-2007 06:54 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Clubs, Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.