Gas Guzzler Tax Eliminated? - Mercedes Benz SLK Forum

AMGs For those high performance Mercedes-Benz R170-SLK 32/R171-SLK 55/R172-SLK 55 cars tuned by AMG -

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 Old 08-01-2007
Founding Member #2

 
etyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Vehicle: 2008 SLK 55
Posts: 19,390
Country:
Chats: 11
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Thanks: 4,571
Thanked 3,141 Times in 2,269 Posts
Garage
(Thread Starter)
Gas Guzzler Tax Eliminated?

I was just doing a "Build Your Own" at the MBUSA website and noticed at the summary page that the Gas Guzzler Tax is $0. Does anyone know if this tax still applies to 2008 model year or is this just a blip/mistake at the MBUSA website?

I emailed the salesperson at the local MB and he states he has no information.

Eddy



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pewter(cubanitsilber metallic)/Beige, PIII package, Airscarf, Hands-Free Communication System, Lighting package; Designo Black Leather Cover on e-brake handle(Thank you Bill T), SmartTop v3.x, John's 3BFM, M113 AMG OEM air filters, Modified R170 ant., clear side-markers & front parking lamps w/error-free LEDs, chromed front & rear turn indicator lamps, steel mesh at battery bay cover & cabin air intake, sock-over-seatbelt buckles, belt-loop guide protectors, Lamin-X fog lamp protectors, bilateral rear fog lamps enabled, AMG crest on gear shift knob
etyu is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 08-01-2007
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bucks County, PA & Overland Park, KS (Work)
Vehicle: '08 SLK55 AMG
Other Toys: '07 Infiniti G35x
Posts: 214
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Gas guzzler tax actually got worse, they're more "accurately" rating them for city/highway mpg, which means lower ratings (and in turn, a higher tax...the tax brackets themselves did not change). The reason it's not showing up is that the 2008 isn't rated yet for the new fuel economy standards.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ratings2008.shtml

Last edited by MDLSLK55; 08-01-2007 at 11:11 PM.
MDLSLK55 is offline  
#3 Old 08-01-2007
Founding Member #2

 
etyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Vehicle: 2008 SLK 55
Posts: 19,390
Country:
Chats: 11
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Thanks: 4,571
Thanked 3,141 Times in 2,269 Posts
Garage
(Thread Starter)
Just found this at fueleconomy.gov: early 2008 data, SLK55 AMG 14/20 (city/hwy) and subject to Gas Guzzler Tax

Link: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/feg2000.htm

Eddy



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pewter(cubanitsilber metallic)/Beige, PIII package, Airscarf, Hands-Free Communication System, Lighting package; Designo Black Leather Cover on e-brake handle(Thank you Bill T), SmartTop v3.x, John's 3BFM, M113 AMG OEM air filters, Modified R170 ant., clear side-markers & front parking lamps w/error-free LEDs, chromed front & rear turn indicator lamps, steel mesh at battery bay cover & cabin air intake, sock-over-seatbelt buckles, belt-loop guide protectors, Lamin-X fog lamp protectors, bilateral rear fog lamps enabled, AMG crest on gear shift knob
etyu is offline  
 
#4 Old 08-01-2007
-1-
Don - Founding Member #4
 
-1-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Vehicle: *2014 BMW i3*2012 Prius Plug-In*All Elect/Hybrid
Posts: 5,857
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,123
Thanked 743 Times in 587 Posts
That gas guzzler tax is a tough pill to swallow. Does it really serve as a deterent or just a major irritant? Who gets the money and what's it used for?
-1- is offline  
#5 Old 08-01-2007
Registered Users
 
reallife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 55
Posts: 158
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My SLK 55 gets 16.5 miles per gallon...

My wife's Toyota Sienna minivan gets the same. My Toyota 4Runner SUV gets about the same also. Guess which of the three is the official gas guzzler? In the ideal world, I should get a tax break for the SLK because I am occupying space on the roadway for much less time to cover the same distance and the same carbon emission/gas useage. In other words, I get there a lot faster for the same cost to the highway and environment. So why not give my car a discount?
reallife is offline  
#6 Old 08-01-2007
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 628
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 85 Times in 36 Posts
I think they should call it a "if you can afford it tax" Did you notice that over a certain weight that vehicles are exempt I think that if you buy more fuel then you pay more in tax already stop before I enter the rant stage
cruzer 8 is offline  
#7 Old 08-02-2007
dsb
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Vehicle: '06 slk55
Posts: 1,231
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 163 Times in 52 Posts
It's my understanding that trucks, minivans and some SUV's are exempt. I agree they should rename it to 'if you can afford it' tax. At least there was truth in the BS 'luxury tax' years ago. Trucks being exempt is BS too. I've seen plenty of lifted trucks getting 9mpg. I think there should be some sort of calculation that comes in play. For example, MPG divided by # seats. Yes, our cars would still be punished, but it would make more sense IMO.
dsb is offline  
#8 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bucks County, PA & Overland Park, KS (Work)
Vehicle: '08 SLK55 AMG
Other Toys: '07 Infiniti G35x
Posts: 214
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsb View Post
I think there should be some sort of calculation that comes in play. For example, MPG divided by # seats. Yes, our cars would still be punished, but it would make more sense IMO.
Wait, I don't get that. So, if you have more seats and are able to drive more people around at 16mpg (which is more ppmpg - people per mpg ), wouldn't you be MORE efficient?
MDLSLK55 is offline  
#9 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users

 
cyberdrakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SoCal, USA
Vehicle: SLK55 2006 widebody
Posts: 3,047
Country:
Chats: 7
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Thanks: 313
Thanked 328 Times in 237 Posts
Garage
Send a message via AIM to cyberdrakon Send a message via MSN to cyberdrakon
Obviously trucks and SUVs are exempt, otherwise how could they keep GM, Chevy, and Ford afloat! All the loans the government has made them would be lost...too bad for us (USA) toyota is now taking advantage of this really well.

The thing about more seats is, around here everyone drives their 9 seat, lifted, 'de-catted' suburban and 5 seat knobby tired H2s by themself on their daily commute. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE big trucks, but when you use the biggest car you can afford, fix it up for offroad, then use it for your single person commute on the freeway........argh. (if i got another car, i'd be getting a truck, but not for my commute).


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RexAccelero.com Widebody SLK 55 AMG
THE ORIGINAL headlight housing blackout starter, Debadged, Kleyman CHMSL flasher, chromed signal bulbs,
roof module, larger AMG intake, H&R lowering springs, Custom X-pipe, 315/25/19" rear, 285/30/19" front, complete Carbon trim.
cyberdrakon is offline  
#10 Old 08-02-2007
Founding Member

 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Vehicle: 06' MBZ SLK
Posts: 4,599
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberdrakon View Post
The thing about more seats is, around here everyone drives their 9 seat, lifted, 'de-catted' suburban and 5 seat knobby tired H2s by themself on their daily commute. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE big trucks, but when you use the biggest car you can afford, fix it up for offroad, then use it for your single person commute on the freeway........argh. (if i got another car, i'd be getting a truck, but not for my commute).
, I wonder the same thing, why get a SUV if you don't go outdoors?

Same applies to modded cars. BBK, CF this, CF that, all these go fast mods and never tracked. At least go and find out if your mods are worth it.

997 TPC turbo C4S
981 Boxster S
06' SLK 350, Iridium/Ash all pkgs. 6-spd, 19" DCR. (Gone but not forgotten)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ynot is offline  
#11 Old 08-02-2007
dsb
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Vehicle: '06 slk55
Posts: 1,231
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 163 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDLSLK55 View Post
Wait, I don't get that. So, if you have more seats and are able to drive more people around at 16mpg (which is more ppmpg - people per mpg ), wouldn't you be MORE efficient?
Correct, that would make it more efficient. BTW, you have an accronym too. Great
dsb is offline  
#12 Old 08-02-2007
dsb
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Vehicle: '06 slk55
Posts: 1,231
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 163 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ynot View Post
Same applies to modded cars. BBK, CF this, CF that, all these go fast mods and never tracked. At least go and find out if your mods are worth it.
Totally agree. I understand when people strictly buy cosmetic mods and don't track/drive fast. However, I'll never understand the crowd that buys performance mods (can be very costly) and never do anything with it.
dsb is offline  
#13 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users
 
reallife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 55
Posts: 158
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
CF?

I saw an interesting article in this week's Newsweek magazine by Amory Lovins, the alternative energy guru. He pointed out the the new Boeing jet is so much lighter due to CF for the airframe that production is already sold out until 2014. Why not cars? Specifically, why not high tech European cars with the latest, greatest technologies already: Mercedes high end cars like ours? Can you imagine? How much weight could be saved? The car could be stiffer, safer, lighter, even more exclusive. I want one!
reallife is offline  
#14 Old 08-02-2007
Founding Member

 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Vehicle: 06' MBZ SLK
Posts: 4,599
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by reallife View Post
I saw an interesting article in this week's Newsweek magazine by Amory Lovins, the alternative energy guru. He pointed out the the new Boeing jet is so much lighter due to CF for the airframe that production is already sold out until 2014. Why not cars? Specifically, why not high tech European cars with the latest, greatest technologies already: Mercedes high end cars like ours? Can you imagine? How much weight could be saved? The car could be stiffer, safer, lighter, even more exclusive. I want one!
They have those, it's called the Pagani Zonda, Porsche Carrera GT, Enzo, and other super exotics, CF cars are very expensive, and those cars comes at a premium.

Enough CF for you?


997 TPC turbo C4S
981 Boxster S
06' SLK 350, Iridium/Ash all pkgs. 6-spd, 19" DCR. (Gone but not forgotten)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ynot is offline  
#15 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users
 
reallife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 55
Posts: 158
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Too much CF1

Yes, that is too much. What I'm talking about is a CF frame, not just body panels which can be relatively ight anyway. I don't like the Cf exterior appearance anyway. Recently, I was talking to an engineer, right here in Rockford, IL who designed and fabricated the molds for the new Boeing's wings. He said the molds as well as the wings and airframe are all CF. They have cornered the market worldwide and that is the main reason CF is so expensive right now. The price will be coming down steeply as new CF production sources are coming on line to supply Boeing. That will make CF much more economical, even to the point that Detroit will eventually be using it for main line production cars in another 10-12 years.
reallife is offline  
#16 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users

 
cyberdrakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SoCal, USA
Vehicle: SLK55 2006 widebody
Posts: 3,047
Country:
Chats: 7
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Thanks: 313
Thanked 328 Times in 237 Posts
Garage
Send a message via AIM to cyberdrakon Send a message via MSN to cyberdrakon
The pagani zonda doesn't use CF for just the body panels.
They sell a CF SLK already...it's called the SLR.

I seriously doubt mainstream cars will use CF for anything other than body panels for a LONG LONG time. Besides the inherent material cost of using CF, CF is EXTREMELY labour intensive to use (as compared to steel). CF used for structural components need to be woven onto a mold, versus simply poured into a mold. The SLR is probably one of the cheapest cars to use CF for structural purposes, and already incorporates revolutionary cost saving methods of manufacturing it (yet still costs nearly a half million $).

Easty, maybe you can give some input on the difficulties of CF manufacturing?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RexAccelero.com Widebody SLK 55 AMG
THE ORIGINAL headlight housing blackout starter, Debadged, Kleyman CHMSL flasher, chromed signal bulbs,
roof module, larger AMG intake, H&R lowering springs, Custom X-pipe, 315/25/19" rear, 285/30/19" front, complete Carbon trim.
cyberdrakon is offline  
#17 Old 08-02-2007
Registered Users
 
reallife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 55
Posts: 158
Country:
Chats: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
CF production techniques

CF isn't really any more labor intensive than using fiberglass cloth or Kevlar for high end canoes and kayaks. It is basically the same process. The fiber panels are mass machine cut, laid up by machine into the molds, moved into the oven for baking, and can then be trimmed by machine. The reason the high end CF cars are expensive really doesn't have much to do with the actual cost of working with CF, aside from the expense of the material, which will be drastically dropping as new sources come on line. There isn't any long term economic reason why CF cars can't be mainstreamed over the next decade or two. Since the majority of fuel energy is used to overcome the initial inertia of the mass of the vehicle, a CF car that weighs half of what a conventional vehicle weighs will be far cheaper to operate. All we need is $200 a barrel oil and $12 a gallon gasoline to push the CF technology along. It is coming a lot sooner than we would like.
reallife is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK Forum > General Discussion about Mercedes Benz SLKs > AMGs

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Upload your files to MEGAUPLOAD
Upload your images to ImageShack

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes Benz SLK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loving the gas prices... mobidutch General Discussion 37 11-25-2008 06:31 AM
UK Gas Wars UK-C200 General Discussion 7 07-27-2008 12:09 PM
save gas they say. iceborne General Modifications R171 2 07-06-2008 07:17 PM
Gas addidtives mazeka SLK R171 General Discussion 4 06-14-2008 11:27 PM
Gas prices -1- Off Topic 20 09-28-2006 04:58 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 

Clubs, Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.