Mercedes Benz SLK World Forum SLKWorld.com The World's Premier Mercedes Benz SLK Community
Home Forums SLK Store Calendar Register FAQ



Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK World Forum > Mercedes Benz R171 SLK Class Cars > SLK R171 General Discussion


SLK R171 General Discussion SLK 200, SLK 280, SLK 300, SLK 350, SLK 55 AMG

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2009   #1 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Vehicle: 2007 SLK 280
Posts: 528
Country:
Thanks: 36
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Chats: 582
Default Would you trade?

Would you trade a 2007 SLK 280 for a 2005 SLK 55? both have the same milleage, and I might have to pay the difference.

Mine:



The Other one:

View Eduardo's Photo Album Eduardo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 01-15-2009   #2 (permalink)
aka John
Platinum Supporter 
 
UK-C200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, UK & Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Vehicle: RHD Jasper Blue C200K Coupe, RHD Jasper Blue SLK55, LHD Black SLK350
Other Toys: Nacra F18
Posts: 4,782
Country:
Donation Level 7 
Thanks: 461
Thanked 917 Times in 595 Posts
Chats: 1135
Default

Two very different cars Eduardo - personal preference. The ride quality and fuel consumption are very different - as is the speed and handling.
View UK-C200's Photo Album UK-C200 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #3 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Vehicle: 2007 SLK 280
Posts: 528
Country:
Thanks: 36
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Chats: 582
Default

I was more concerned about the year and depreciation rate. Honestly I was considering it because the AMG is the best. Top of the line. On look they basically look the same to the general public althou the grey would be easier to maintain.
View Eduardo's Photo Album Eduardo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-15-2009   #4 (permalink)
aka John
Platinum Supporter 
 
UK-C200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, UK & Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Vehicle: RHD Jasper Blue C200K Coupe, RHD Jasper Blue SLK55, LHD Black SLK350
Other Toys: Nacra F18
Posts: 4,782
Country:
Donation Level 7 
Thanks: 461
Thanked 917 Times in 595 Posts
Chats: 1135
Default

In the US, the depreciation rate seems to be consistent between all the models.
View UK-C200's Photo Album UK-C200 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #5 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 814
Country:
Thanks: 92
Thanked 107 Times in 77 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

Eduardo:

How often do you drive your 280 at 10/10ths? Wide open, and cornering at the limits? If you do this often and find its performance lacking, the 55 AMG is for you. If you never do it, you might not enjoy the 55's harsher ride and lessened gas mileage the next time gas hits $4 per gallon.
View Dolebludger's Photo Album Dolebludger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
468*60 NEW Generic Shop Tumi
Old 01-15-2009   #6 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Vehicle: 2007 SLK 280
Posts: 528
Country:
Thanks: 36
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Chats: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolebludger View Post
Eduardo:

How often do you drive your 280 at 10/10ths? Wide open, and cornering at the limits? If you do this often and find its performance lacking, the 55 AMG is for you. If you never do it, you might not enjoy the 55's harsher ride and lessened gas mileage the next time gas hits $4 per gallon.
It gets harsher?

I thought it was the other way around.
View Eduardo's Photo Album Eduardo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #7 (permalink)
Administrator
 
admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Data Center
Vehicle: Linux Server
Posts: 552
Country:
Thanks: 103
Thanked 267 Times in 96 Posts
Chats: 424
Default

I traded a 06 slk55 for a 03 P 996 X50 car
View admin's Photo Album admin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #8 (permalink)
aka John
Platinum Supporter 
 
UK-C200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, UK & Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Vehicle: RHD Jasper Blue C200K Coupe, RHD Jasper Blue SLK55, LHD Black SLK350
Other Toys: Nacra F18
Posts: 4,782
Country:
Donation Level 7 
Thanks: 461
Thanked 917 Times in 595 Posts
Chats: 1135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eduardo View Post
It gets harsher?

I thought it was the other way around.

Nah, the 280 has the "best" ride quality of all three, and the '55 with the 030 package is down right brutal (or at least it was for me!).
View UK-C200's Photo Album UK-C200 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #9 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Vehicle: 2007 SLK 280
Posts: 528
Country:
Thanks: 36
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Chats: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UK-C200 View Post
Nah, the 280 has the "best" ride quality of all three, and the '55 with the 030 package is down right brutal (or at least it was for me!).
I hadn't imagine, I've driven SUVs all my life, and being 6'2" it took some getting used to, also the squeaking in the cabin.
View Eduardo's Photo Album Eduardo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #10 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 280 w. 6M
Other Toys: 2000 New Beetle GLS w. 5M
Posts: 700
Country:
Thanks: 27
Thanked 47 Times in 27 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eduardo View Post
the squeaking in the cabin.
What are you talking about? Mine doesn't squeak. You should have that checked out.

To answer your question - no, would not trade. I can't even take the 280 to the top speed where I live. The occasions where I can mash the throttle are far between, and even then, after a few seconds I'm in jail-speed territory. Most importantly though, I would not want to give up the manual transmission.
View Ikarus's Photo Album Ikarus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Help Support SLKWorld with your Paid Membership
Old 01-16-2009   #11 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
R171pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lisbon
Vehicle: Mercedes ML 320 Cdi
Other Toys: Mercedes SLK 200 K (FL)
Posts: 236
Country:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

If I were you I´ll keep the 350, this engine is more than sufficient for the R171 body and what´s the point of changing a 07´car for a 05'?

I don´t Know if you bought yours brand new, and if that was the case is another reason to keep it.

With this I´m not saying that the 55 ins´t a brilliant car, far from that
View R171pt's Photo Album R171pt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #12 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 814
Country:
Thanks: 92
Thanked 107 Times in 77 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

Look, some like it and some don't, but all agree that the 55 has a harsher (or "firmer" ) ride than the 280. It also has heavier handling because it is -- well -- heavier. Fuel economy is not as good on the 55 because it has a much larger engine. repairs and parts are often costlier on the 55, as is insurance. I'm not knocking the 55. Those who want a true muscular sports car and are aware of the trade-offs and willing to take them should definitely get a 55. Those who are not aware and willing should think twice. If you have not already done so, test drive a 55 AMG. Only you can determine if it fits your criteria.

I thought about getting a 55 AMG. I thought the ride would be about like my Honda S 2000, and I can live quite well with that. I test drove a 55 and compared to the S 2000 felt like I was being hammered to death. There are performance based reasons for this, of course. But as the role my intended SLK would serve in my "fleet" included a reasonable touring ride, the 55 was "out" for me.

I sound like a broken record, but everybody needs to test drive a particular car before spending much time in looking for one for sale at a good price. You may like the particular model, but you may not -- in which case all your looking becomes a waste of time.
View Dolebludger's Photo Album Dolebludger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #13 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Vehicle: (The Black Pearl) 2006 SLK55 AMG
Posts: 462
Country:
Donation Level 2 
Thanks: 1
Thanked 79 Times in 40 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

I've had a 350 and a 55. Once you own or drive the 55 there is no turning back. Unless they're gonna make an SLK63!!!
View Mighty Joe's Photo Album Mighty Joe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mighty Joe For This Useful Post:
Old 01-16-2009   #14 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Vehicle: 06 SLK55
Other Toys: Lexus 400h, Wii
Posts: 316
Country:
Donation Level 2 
Thanks: 56
Thanked 54 Times in 33 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty Joe View Post
I've had a 350 and a 55. Once you own or drive the 55 there is no turning back. Unless they're gonna make an SLK63!!!
Same here, it is all over for me, actually right at the moment when the sale start the engine.

However, like Dole said, it is all personal need afterall as they are too very different cars from the driving experience stand point. If the benefit of a 55 becomes a negative feature (harsh ride), then stick with the 280. Likewise, if the 280 is too soft or not powerful enough for your own requirement, then you should definitely test drive the 55.

In my case, my insurance was lower by $100 per year when I switch from 350 to 55 gas consumption definitely went up by about $12 to $15 per month. Not so sure about the maintenance as I only had the 55 for 1 year, did the Service C which cost about $500, not significantly more than the 350. It is my daily ride, although not drive it daily as I also have other vehicles from the family to use, so the running cost will not be as high.

Anyhow, go test drive one and feel for yourself!
View snowbyhui's Photo Album snowbyhui is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #15 (permalink)
SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Vehicle: 06 SLK 350
Posts: 77
Country:
Thanks: 22
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Chats: 9
Default

I've never driven the slk 55 before, but i have driven the E 55 and the E 320. Well let me just say my personal belief is once you go 55 there is no other! Then again I'm also really satisfied with my slk 350, but maybe its because I've never driven the slk 55? In the end '350s are from earth and '55s are from mars! because they are outta this world!!!(sorry for the pun...)
View Tpman's Photo Album Tpman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-16-2009   #16 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: SLK55AMG
Posts: 557
Country:
Thanks: 17
Thanked 90 Times in 70 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

I would go 55 everytime unless I was desperate for a manual then I would buy a Porsche again. The 55 really has a sense of occasion and thats what differentiates it for me in the end. Im used to hardcore cars so the ride on my 55 I would seriously describe as a GT ride, I drive it every day as I see it as an every driver. I dont agree that an S2000 has a much better ride but I think europeans have a different view than US citizens, its probably the corners. An RS 911 or a lotus exige have a hard ride in my speak. I would avoid the 030 package which I agree is out of limo territory, the Black Series showed that a 55 doesnt do hardcore very well.
View Legin's Photo Album Legin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #17 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck.
Posts: 814
Country:
Thanks: 92
Thanked 107 Times in 77 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

I have driven a friend's CLK 55 AMG convertible AND an SLK 55 AMG. I did not experience the significantly stiffer ride and heavier handling in the CLK due to the AMG set-up (compared with non-AMG CLKs I've driven). Just a bunch more power.

On the other hand, with the SLKs I did experience a much firmer ride and heavier handling with the 55 AMG version than with the 280.

So, we cannot generalize about "all AMGs do this or that" because There are differences.

Bottom line, before you get serious about an E 55 AMG or a CLK 55 AMG, test drive one. Ditto for the SLK 55 AMG.
View Dolebludger's Photo Album Dolebludger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #18 (permalink)
Elite SLK World Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: SLK55AMG
Posts: 557
Country:
Thanks: 17
Thanked 90 Times in 70 Posts
Chats: 0
Default

We can generalise that a slk 280 rides more like a Sedan and a slk 55 a sportscar , we can generalise that a slk55 is smoother than a 964 RS. Of course there are always exceptions depending on the car specification but its still a generalisation
View Legin's Photo Album Legin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #19 (permalink)
Thread Hijacker
Platinum Supporter 
 
dmjonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta
Vehicle: formerly 2001 SLK320, and 2006 55AMG. Shopping again.
Other Toys: X3, 9-3, PT, F150, C300, CJ-5, 767
Posts: 2,236
Country:
Donation Level 3 
Thanks: 503
Thanked 558 Times in 291 Posts
Chats: 1407
Send a message via Yahoo to dmjonez
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolebludger View Post
Look, some like it and some don't, but all agree that the 55 has a harsher (or "firmer" ) ride than the 280. It also has heavier handling because it is -- well -- heavier. Fuel economy is not as good on the 55 because it has a much larger engine. repairs and parts are often costlier on the 55, as is insurance. I'm not knocking the 55. Those who want a true muscular sports car and are aware of the trade-offs and willing to take them should definitely get a 55. Those who are not aware and willing should think twice. If you have not already done so, test drive a 55 AMG. Only you can determine if it fits your criteria.

I thought about getting a 55 AMG. I thought the ride would be about like my Honda S 2000, and I can live quite well with that. I test drove a 55 and compared to the S 2000 felt like I was being hammered to death. There are performance based reasons for this, of course. But as the role my intended SLK would serve in my "fleet" included a reasonable touring ride, the 55 was "out" for me.

I sound like a broken record, but everybody needs to test drive a particular car before spending much time in looking for one for sale at a good price. You may like the particular model, but you may not -- in which case all your looking becomes a waste of time.
I completely agree. All three current versions are wonderful cars. They aren't "good-better-best." They're different. All of the owners here chose their own version for a multitude of reasons, all stated above. I'd suggest anyone in the market consider all of the well-stated points above and choose your car for your own priorities and not anyone else's. Having said that, It IS extremely valuable to get opinions about the different cars, just to help decide what one might prefer. Reading about the newer cars has helped me decide I want an airscarf in my next SLK, and I've never had one. But the discussion alone has made me realize I'd like to have the function based on everyone's description. After I read about it, I test drove a car with one, and they were right...
View dmjonez's Photo Album dmjonez is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!facebook this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dmjonez For This Useful Post:
Sponsored Links
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mercedes Benz SLK World Forum > Mercedes Benz R171 SLK Class Cars > SLK R171 General Discussion

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would you trade a SLK 350 for an SLK AMG JRCNRING General Discussion 40 09-10-2009 04:02 PM
Any none AMGs wanna trade? IIIMBPIII General Discussion 4 05-28-2008 03:57 PM
Trade valuation for SLK Scoobysnack Ask DansSLK 2 07-28-2007 09:18 PM
UK SLK350 - Private or Trade-in Sale? Andy747 SLK R171 General Discussion 6 01-15-2007 12:21 PM
think of trade in for SLK HwoALanG SLK R171 General Discussion 13 10-22-2006 11:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO
Clubs, Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
SLKWorld 2006-2010

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123