Thinking of purchasing slk55amg 2009, some advise... - Page 2

**KTownAMG** · 05-17-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ikarus

This is not a mistake she made. Let's not be unfair. By the time this review was aired (pre-2006), the information about how to enable dyno mode may not have been publicly available yet and even if it was, it is not something MB should be given any credit for, since the procedure is deliberately complicated and is not documented in the official user documentation.

Ikarus,
I wasn't trying to unfair, only trying to clarify her point in the video. You may be right, at the time of the review it may not have been well known.
It's probably not well released due to safety concerns... To paraphrase a good friend of mine.

"This will transform the 55 into a 1960's muscle car...If you shut off the ESP, Traction control and BAS...you can make your car perform antics that the other drivers next to you will not appreciate (Spoiled sports)...

The Traction control, ESP, and ABS come in handy....I took it off one
time...if you lose it...you have lost it.

With everything on...you can pull 1.9+ G's in curves no Problem.....With it off it becomes a balancing act...that you will not want to lose".

Does this make sense?

volito · 05-17-2008

Interesting advise and comments so far with no negatives yet. Seems like everyone is enjoying there slk's. I looked at a few members pics and the cars look NICE. When the time comes I would definitely look at this car first. Keep the comments and advise coming...

Heres another one beating on handling...
http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/article/197954

**Duo-Art** · 05-17-2008

OK, I'll give you a negative. The radio antenna is too long. That's it!!!

volito · 05-17-2008

hey! see it has at least one...

**jbanks15** · 05-17-2008

but you can buy a shortie for older models and the 09 has a short antenna!

**snowbyhui** · 05-17-2008

I do have 2 things that I don't like about the car

, but that could be related to what I used to with other cars (Civic, Audi, Lexus or BMW).

The wiper control is not the usual type you see which is on the right handside of the steering wheel, you flip it up or down to enable it for different speed and pulling it back for the windshield fluid. As for the R171, you need to turn (rotate) the handle instead and also push the end of the handle to get windshield fluid, instead of justing pulling back the handling. All I am saying it is not as convenience to get the wiper to do sth where most cars will have a separate control handle for just that purpose. As I only have the R171s (350 before and 55 now), I don't know if other MB model is the same, I find it very inconvenient at the beginning, but sort of getting used to it now.
The second thing is about the highbeam. If you want you highbeam to stay on, you need to turn the light switch all the way to the right, otherwise the highbeam will not stay on even you push the light handle forward.

That said, these are very minor things about the car. If you ask me to pick between the available convertible car as of today(within my financial capacity) I will make the same decision without a second thought about the 350 and 55.

Both are great cars, style, handling, the sound of both V6 and V8 and the hardtop covertible, that is hard to beat. It is a harder decision now between the facelift 350 and 55 as the 350 has 300 horse which is not much less than the 55, but with even better gas milage than the pre-facelift 350.

Good luck on your search for your upgrade.

Ikarus · 05-17-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by volito

Heres another one beating on handling...
http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/article/197954

You're really starting to lose me here. Where on earth are they beating on handling?

**KTownAMG** · 05-17-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ikarus

You're really starting to lose me here. Where on earth are they beating on handling?

Ditto, I thought it was a positive review...

**DansSlk** · 05-17-2008

Before this turns sour let's clear this up.

We are talking about a Mercedes Benz roadster here and the hint is in Mercedes Benz, typically the car's they build are autobahn cruisers built to go stupidly fast in a straight line so cornering ability does not come into the equation.

With the SLK they have outdone themselves and the limiting factors when it comes to handling abilities are weight and CoG, they are a bit on the heavy side because of the high strength shell and the luxuries built into them and the CoG is higher than it would be in a coupe of similar size because of the vario-roof, but MB have put in so much effort into the dynamics of the car that it will match any other car of similar size, layout and weight in handling ability, then if i bring the huge power output into play you get a car that can maintain it's lead in corners and extend it in straights.

You need a realistic view of what this car is and what it can do.

If you intend to drive this car on a track against car's built for the track then you will be disappointed, if you intend to drive it sportingly on a road and on a track against other road car's you will be very pleased, if you only intend to drive it on normal roads then an S class is capable of doing the job just as well as a Porsche 911.

**etyu** · 05-17-2008

I don't know if it's a negative (could be positive for some): people tend to stare at you and your ride (could be the other way around) and this makes me uneasy/squimish

The other day, I noticed three cars slowing down to almost 0 mph, while I was giving the car its usual wash on the driveway. I didn't notice this right away as my back was turned.

I also had, on more than 2 occasions, drivers roll down their windows at a traffic stop, asking me how much I paid and complimenting the vehicle and giving

sign.

Mighty Joe · 05-17-2008

Steering problems? I never read that and never experienced that. I had an '05 SLK350 and bumped to a 55. The power from the SLK55 is just RIGHT.

As far as the chic car goes. I've never heard that one either. Maybe its because I'm 6'2" and 235lbs and still train in some MMA circles! Go figure!

MJ

**alroumi** · 05-18-2008

I think vicky didnt drive the SLK well, she was bouncing all over the track and complaining about the seats and steering wheel.

**FishtailnZ** · 05-18-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by volito

Interesting advise and comments so far with no negatives yet. Seems like everyone is enjoying there slk's. I looked at a few members pics and the cars look NICE. When the time comes I would definitely look at this car first. Keep the comments and advise coming...

Almost 2 years and 25k on the clock with no regrets here. The SLK55's strong suit is it's ability to do ALL things well, even without leading the pack in any one particular area. It's a much more well rounded car than it's other 'vert competitors IMO, which makes for a very satisfying daily driver IMO. I've taken it to the track, weekend getaways, daily grind back and forth to work; hard top coupe in inclement weather, drop top convertible for sunny drives, and it draws more attention than is sometimes comfortable *L*. It does it all, what more could you want - I'm more than happy with ours.

volito · 05-18-2008

"DansSLK" well said that explains a lot of what I been reading. To all the SLK owners I am definitely not looking to bash the car as I like it a lot. I am just looking for some opinions from owners. Who else to ask for better advise? "someone who drives it and owns the car or a test driver driving it once". Again I appreciate all your post and hope to become an SLK owner.

**alroumi** · 05-19-2008

A disadvantage I find in the R171 SLK,
is that there is a lack of leather dashboard and other appointments in the interior

**Dolebludger** · 05-22-2008

I agree with Mohammed here. in that the interior of the 171 could use some improvement. I also have a W203 C320, and its interior is elegant compared to my SLK 280. But the SLK interior is fully functional, and it is a sports car, so I should not complain as some sports car interiors aren't even functional.

shahedC · 05-22-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by volito

New to forum and it looks great and lots of information here. Glad i found it as I am thinking of purchasing an 2009. ...

I test drove an 06 SLK55 AMG before I purchased my 07 SLK350. I have nothing against it, I just decided to save a few bucks by getting the 350, and load up on all packages and all the options/accessories that I wanted.

The new style includes split bumper and smaller antenna. Test drive one, then buy it if you like it. You won't regret it.

Heavier than an MX-5.. but I'm assuming that you don't have the new PRHT MX-5, so the SLK's folding roof will be something you will appreciate.

~shahedc
.

cyberdrakon · 05-22-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbyhui

The wiper control is not the usual type you see which is on the right handside of the steering wheel, you flip it up or down to enable it for different speed and pulling it back for the windshield fluid. As for the R171, you need to turn (rotate) the handle instead and also push the end of the handle to get windshield fluid, instead of justing pulling back the handling.

That's standard mercedes, after driving numberous toyotas, lexus, cadi's, and benz, i've found it the most convenient...but takes some time to get used to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbyhui

The second thing is about the highbeam. If you want you highbeam to stay on, you need to turn the light switch all the way to the right, otherwise the highbeam will not stay on even you push the light handle forward.

Something is wrong with your car, as long as the light is set on auto OR the far right and you push the lever forward, it should click into place and hold the high-beams.

Edward

05-17-2008	#25 (permalink)
jbanks15 Founding Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Valrico, Florida Vehicle: 2009 SLK 55 AMG Posts: 708 Country: Thanks: 8 Thanked 42 Times in 30 Posts	but you can buy a shortie for older models and the 09 has a short antenna! __________________ Jeff 2009 SLK 55 AMG Black/Black Premium 1, Multimedia, Lighting packages Clearshield Protective Film OEM MB Plexiglass Windscreen Eurolight Clear Side Markers Smarttop version 3.22 Kleyman 3rd Brake Light Flashing/Strobing Module V1.5 (Noregrets Custom Works)

05-17-2008	#29 (permalink)
DansSlk Dude Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Wales Vehicle: 05 B55S (Brabus 6.1 S) Posts: 6,794 Country: Thanks: 96 Thanked 225 Times in 177 Posts	Before this turns sour let's clear this up. We are talking about a Mercedes Benz roadster here and the hint is in Mercedes Benz, typically the car's they build are autobahn cruisers built to go stupidly fast in a straight line so cornering ability does not come into the equation. With the SLK they have outdone themselves and the limiting factors when it comes to handling abilities are weight and CoG, they are a bit on the heavy side because of the high strength shell and the luxuries built into them and the CoG is higher than it would be in a coupe of similar size because of the vario-roof, but MB have put in so much effort into the dynamics of the car that it will match any other car of similar size, layout and weight in handling ability, then if i bring the huge power output into play you get a car that can maintain it's lead in corners and extend it in straights. You need a realistic view of what this car is and what it can do. If you intend to drive this car on a track against car's built for the track then you will be disappointed, if you intend to drive it sportingly on a road and on a track against other road car's you will be very pleased, if you only intend to drive it on normal roads then an S class is capable of doing the job just as well as a Porsche 911. __________________ One thing you will learn with German cars - If it's simple it ain't happening.

05-17-2008	#30 (permalink)
etyu Founding Member #2 / Ambassador Of Good Will Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Orange County, CA Vehicle: 2008 SLK 55 Posts: 5,306 Country: Thanks: 381 Thanked 282 Times in 173 Posts	I don't know if it's a negative (could be positive for some): people tend to stare at you and your ride (could be the other way around) and this makes me uneasy/squimish The other day, I noticed three cars slowing down to almost 0 mph, while I was giving the car its usual wash on the driveway. I didn't notice this right away as my back was turned. I also had, on more than 2 occasions, drivers roll down their windows at a traffic stop, asking me how much I paid and complimenting the vehicle and giving sign. __________________ *Eddy* To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Pewter/Beige, PIII package, Airscarf, Hands-Free Communication System, Lighting package Designo Black Leather Cover on e-brake handle, ( To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Bill T), SmartTop v1.0, Kleyman 3BFM (NoRegret Custom), Green Air Filters, *Mod. R170 ant.*, EuroClear sidemarkers w/PIAA PlasmaIon lamps, chromed front & rear turn indicator lamps, PIAA SuperPlasmaGTX front parking lamps, bilateral rear fog lamps enabled.

05-18-2008	#32 (permalink)
alroumi Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait Vehicle: 2006 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG Other Toys: 2007 Ebony Jaguar XKR Coupe' and 06 Black Cayenne S Posts: 6,288 Country: Thanks: 298 Thanked 232 Times in 146 Posts	I think vicky didnt drive the SLK well, she was bouncing all over the track and complaining about the seats and steering wheel. __________________ 06 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG 06 Porsche Cayenne S 07 Jaguar XKR Coupe' I use the Torque and keep the HP for my Steak Sauce!

05-19-2008	#35 (permalink)
alroumi Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait Vehicle: 2006 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG Other Toys: 2007 Ebony Jaguar XKR Coupe' and 06 Black Cayenne S Posts: 6,288 Country: Thanks: 298 Thanked 232 Times in 146 Posts	A disadvantage I find in the R171 SLK, is that there is a lack of leather dashboard and other appointments in the interior __________________ 06 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG 06 Porsche Cayenne S 07 Jaguar XKR Coupe' I use the Torque and keep the HP for my Steak Sauce!

05-17-2008	#22 (permalink)
volito SLK World Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: NY Vehicle: Thinking about an slk55 Other Toys: E350, mazda mx5 Posts: 12 Country: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Interesting advise and comments so far with no negatives yet. Seems like everyone is enjoying there slk's. I looked at a few members pics and the cars look NICE. When the time comes I would definitely look at this car first. Keep the comments and advise coming... Heres another one beating on handling... http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/article/197954

05-17-2008	#23 (permalink)
Duo-Art Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 546 Thanks: 0 Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts	OK, I'll give you a negative. The radio antenna is too long. That's it!!!

05-17-2008	#24 (permalink)
volito SLK World Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: NY Vehicle: Thinking about an slk55 Other Toys: E350, mazda mx5 Posts: 12 Country: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	hey! see it has at least one...

05-17-2008	#26 (permalink)
snowbyhui Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto, Canada Vehicle: 06 SLK55 Other Toys: Lexus 400h, Wii Posts: 202 Country: Thanks: 36 Thanked 44 Times in 24 Posts	I do have 2 things that I don't like about the car , but that could be related to what I used to with other cars (Civic, Audi, Lexus or BMW). The wiper control is not the usual type you see which is on the right handside of the steering wheel, you flip it up or down to enable it for different speed and pulling it back for the windshield fluid. As for the R171, you need to turn (rotate) the handle instead and also push the end of the handle to get windshield fluid, instead of justing pulling back the handling. All I am saying it is not as convenience to get the wiper to do sth where most cars will have a separate control handle for just that purpose. As I only have the R171s (350 before and 55 now), I don't know if other MB model is the same, I find it very inconvenient at the beginning, but sort of getting used to it now. The second thing is about the highbeam. If you want you highbeam to stay on, you need to turn the light switch all the way to the right, otherwise the highbeam will not stay on even you push the light handle forward. That said, these are very minor things about the car. If you ask me to pick between the available convertible car as of today(within my financial capacity) I will make the same decision without a second thought about the 350 and 55. Both are great cars, style, handling, the sound of both V6 and V8 and the hardtop covertible, that is hard to beat. It is a harder decision now between the facelift 350 and 55 as the 350 has 300 horse which is not much less than the 55, but with even better gas milage than the pre-facelift 350. Good luck on your search for your upgrade.

05-17-2008	#31 (permalink)
Mighty Joe Senior SLK World Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Atlanta, Ga Vehicle: 2006 SLK55 AMG Posts: 121 Country: Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts	Steering problems? I never read that and never experienced that. I had an '05 SLK350 and bumped to a 55. The power from the SLK55 is just RIGHT. As far as the chic car goes. I've never heard that one either. Maybe its because I'm 6'2" and 235lbs and still train in some MMA circles! Go figure! MJ

05-18-2008	#34 (permalink)
volito SLK World Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: NY Vehicle: Thinking about an slk55 Other Toys: E350, mazda mx5 Posts: 12 Country: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	"DansSLK" well said that explains a lot of what I been reading. To all the SLK owners I am definitely not looking to bash the car as I like it a lot. I am just looking for some opinions from owners. Who else to ask for better advise? "someone who drives it and owns the car or a test driver driving it once". Again I appreciate all your post and hope to become an SLK owner.

05-22-2008	#36 (permalink)
Dolebludger Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Yukon, OK Vehicle: '07 SLK 280; '04 C 320, '01 Honda S 2000, '98 Ford Ranger truck. Posts: 569 Country: Thanks: 40 Thanked 77 Times in 52 Posts	I agree with Mohammed here. in that the interior of the 171 could use some improvement. I also have a W203 C320, and its interior is elegant compared to my SLK 280. But the SLK interior is fully functional, and it is a sports car, so I should not complain as some sports car interiors aren't even functional.

05-22-2008	#39 (permalink)
cyberdrakon Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: SoCal, USA Vehicle: SLK55 2006 Other Toys: 560SEC 1990, CLK500 2005 Posts: 1,405 Country: Thanks: 26 Thanked 63 Times in 42 Posts

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links