| |||||||
| Notices |
| Performance MODS for the R171 How to make your SLK perform better |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior SLK World Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 280
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 36
Thanked 34 Times in 10 Posts
| So I thought I'd share a little bit of my personal experience with suspension on the SLK (R171). When I first began tracking, I knew nothing about the importance of tires and suspension. In fact I just wanted suspension for the looks of lowering. I started off by picking up a set of Eibach Pro-Kit springs. They were probably the cheapest springs on the market at around $250 - $350 CDN and probably did the least amount of drop. Approx 1.0" if I recall, but for accuracy please see www.eibach.com. Anyways, if you're only looking for the look of having the awkward gap removed without compromising the stock ride-quality feel, this spring will help you do that without giving up that OEM feel. I mean it was a little stiffer, but it wasn't too noticable and that might be because SLK suspension is generally stiffer than most other MB's as it is. (Note, I did not swap shocks. stock was fine). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() However, if you are looking for a more aggressive feel and don't want to take the financial jump of Coilovers, H&R springs would have been a better choice. I believe they also do a deeper drop (closer to the 1.7" or 1.8" mark if I recall). I don't know if you need to swap shocks though. Anyways, getting sucked in deeper and deeper down the tracking bunny-hole, I couldn't fight it anymore and I picked up a set of Bilstein PSS9 Coilovers. I haven't had the chance to put it to a real test yet, but I can feel it's much stiffer. Also the ride-height drops much more than any of the springs mentioned earlier. As you can see, the rear is practically tucking. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() When regular rims go back on, I'll try to throw up another pic. P.S. Eibach springs are for sale now!!
__________________ 2006 SLK 280 6MT To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait
Vehicle: 2006 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG
Posts: 6,275
Country: Thanks: 291
Thanked 231 Times in 145 Posts
| Congratulations on the upgrade, the car looks much more pronounced now.
__________________ 06 Kleemann Designo Mocha Black SLK55 AMG 06 Porsche Cayenne S 07 Jaguar XKR Coupe' I use the Torque and keep the HP for my Steak Sauce! |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to alroumi For This Useful Post: |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: NorCal
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 280 w. 6M
Posts: 596
Country: Thanks: 18
Thanked 40 Times in 20 Posts
| The Eibachs looked perfect. Your current setup is too low, in my opinion. Last edited by Ikarus; 07-11-2008 at 02:17 PM. |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ikarus For This Useful Post: |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Founding Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Colorado
Vehicle: 06' MBZ SLK
Posts: 2,795
Country: Thanks: 135
Thanked 35 Times in 30 Posts
| +1, For regular street driving, an inch is perfect, it has the best stance, the PSS9 looks way too low, might be good on the track to keep you planted
__________________ 06' SLK 350, Iridium/Ash all pkgs. 6-spd, 19" DCR. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ynot For This Useful Post: |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: NorCal
Vehicle: '06 slk55
Posts: 1,176
Country: Thanks: 67
Thanked 120 Times in 42 Posts
| Thanks for the info. I'm much more interested in the performance difference between the two vs just the difference in the amount of lowering. I'll hold my comments until you post pics with your other wheels. BTW, they are adjustable aren't they? Couldn't you simply raise the rear a little?
__________________ SOLD! 06 Mercedes Benz SLK55 Caspian Blue / Black & Ash To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to dsb For This Useful Post: |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Don't feed the trolls... Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Nfld., Canada
Other Toys: Wife, kids, dogs...
Posts: 1,490
Country: Thanks: 285
Thanked 212 Times in 95 Posts
| Your having fun with the car Kelvin, that's what counts...looks good too!
__________________ - Bill Waiting on a 2009 C63 Opal Fire Red/Alpaca Grey R.I.P. 2006 SLK55 Caspian Blue/Beige Stock 1/4 mile results: ET 12.72, trap 110.80, 60' 1.80 Some guys they just give up living and start dying little by little, piece by piece. Some guys come home from work and wash up and go racin' in the street... - B. Springsteen |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to FishtailnZ For This Useful Post: |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Senior SLK World Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 280
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 36
Thanked 34 Times in 10 Posts
| Well I was gonna hold out to post until I had some additional pics but I just returned from the track...(well actually it was last Saturday)... I can now talk more about performance difference: Using the Coilovers First things first, I can definately say that there is a significant difference in handling. Yes they are height adjustable as well as stiffness adjustable. The problem lies in that you have to remove the brakes and possibly part of...(I forgot what it's called...the linkage in the back) to get to the coils to lower the rear. The front is easier because where you do the adjusting it is visible and you just have to remove the wheels. To adjust stiffness in the rears, there is a knob at the top of the coils that you can just turn to choose how soft or stiff you want it to be. The only thing is that it requires you to cut a hole in the trunk fabric to get to it. The good thing is, MB seems to have that in mind because they've made pre-cut dotted lines as to where it is going to come out. If you close the trunk partition you can see on both sides where the dotted lines come out. Now to adjust stiffness in the front, for some reason it's underneath the coils instead of on the top like most CO's that I've seen. To adjust this you have to jack up the car, remove the cap and then there's the same knob with numbers from 1 - 9. 9 being the softest. My current set up is 3/4 stiffest in the rears and fully lowered while the front is slightly higher and 1/2 stiffness. This is just because the rear is so much more difficult to adjust. To be honest, I expected a really harsh ride but in the end, after driving it for a few days, it's really not bad at all. It's stiffer yes, but not harsh at all. Where I Tracked To give a quick background, I ran on a Shannonville Motorsport Park which is about 2 hours East of Toronto and it's actually a more technical track. In fact I believe it started off as a bike track but this I'm not sure of. I like this track and this group that I run with for 2 reasons: 1) It is more technical and not very high-speed so this tests out the nimbleness and handling of having a roadster 2) There are a lot of Hondas that run with this group. This is great practice because these light machines usually dominate low-speed tracks with a great number of corners (that is of course until the rare Lotus Elise driver shows up to play). S2000s are my favourite competitor. Performance on Track Saturday was the day I've been waiting for. I was able to get my brother to come along track with his w204 C300 6MT and we threw on R-compounds (Toyo Proxes RA1 to be exact) on both cars to try to make it closer to an apple-to-apple suspension comparison (even though I know they are both very different cars). Anyways, so I got to track, set up the tires and lined up to run out there. I really should have timed myself to compare, but I couldn't help but just drive and do nothing else. When I took the first corner, I already knew that this was what I've been looking for. I tracked once with stock suspension and I found there to be quite a bit body roll for a little roadster. I guess it had to do with MB trying to keep it somewhat comfortable for a weekend cruiser. When I added the Eibachs, it gave me that nice lowered look and slightly stiffer (barely noticeable) suspension to have a little bit more fun on track. Coupled with the tires, also gave me a stab at the S2000s that run pretty well in this circuit. Now to step it up with the Bilstein PSS9s. I could not believe how much body roll was eliminated when I took that first corner! It's hard to throw numbers down the way Road & Track might when they're testing a corner, but I just knew it was significantly better even from my seating position alone. Previously to keep myself restrained in the stock seats, I would prep by sitting as far back as possible, locking in the seatbelt, then forcing my chair up as close as I needed. With the seatbelt fully tensed, it helped a little bit when I took corners and so I relied less on my body to keep me sitting straight up. On Saturday, I didn't really need that at all. All the driver-unfriendly daily driving had been worth it to be able to take corners like that. I wished there were a lot more like there usually are, but that day there was only one Black S2000 that I passed on the track and it felt almost too easy. I believe he's probably a newer driver on close to stock set up (if not completely stock). I think I'm happy enough that I don't really need to continue my search for sway bars and strut bars. For me this is enough to have fun. I will try to follow up soon with pics. ![]() ![]()
__________________ 2006 SLK 280 6MT To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Elite SLK World Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: NorCal
Vehicle: '06 slk55
Posts: 1,176
Country: Thanks: 67
Thanked 120 Times in 42 Posts
| Thanks b4tm4n for the review. I think I will eventually move to coilovers. I constantly hear glowing reviews just like yours. Thanks again for the great post.
__________________ SOLD! 06 Mercedes Benz SLK55 Caspian Blue / Black & Ash To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
| The Following User Says Thank You to dsb For This Useful Post: |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Senior SLK World Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Vehicle: 2006 SLK 280
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 36
Thanked 34 Times in 10 Posts
| On the 350 17's... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________ 2006 SLK 280 6MT To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does the 2007 SLK55 have the passenger mirror-drop in Reverse gear feature? | ProtonVehiCROSS | Help and Support | 7 | 07-28-2008 06:24 PM |
| Drop down door... | reallife | General Discussion | 8 | 12-16-2007 08:07 PM |
| Card Drop in Manhattan | rjm16 | I've Spotted a SLK | 1 | 08-05-2007 11:19 PM |
| Which Springs give you the best drop? | d23 | Performance MODS for the R171 | 23 | 05-03-2007 02:43 AM |
| Drop small rear windows | N4PWJ | SLK R171 General Discussion | 11 | 10-18-2006 08:33 AM |
