Quote:
Originally Posted by MCFaisal  SLK350 vs. S2000 the 350 should take the win because of the huge torque advantage..
most S2000s have mods done to them as they aren't as expensive to mod as the SLK. Everyone who owns S2000 here in my town( around 15 of them) only one is bone stock. At most the S2000 does 0-60 in 5.2 seconds w/ a amazing driver. The 350 does it in 5.4 if im not mistaken. |
I've never seen a stock run 5.2 secs to 60mph, I thought it was a 14 sec 1/4 mile car, I know it's top speed is a couple of miles slower in the 1/4, on the top end the SLK should pull from it easily. From a stop light, it's a driver's race. The S2000 is a big go-kart so I'm not surprise at it's handling capabilities, I was trolling the s2ki.com forum and it seems like everyone beats it, I highly doubt that, I know a stock SLK vs a stock S2000 at this elevation (5200 ft up), the SLK will win, the s2k loose alot more hp here, it's lack of torque doesn't help either, regardless, the s2k is a fun car, I would get it if I couldn't afford a SLK.